Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arvid Nordquist vs Rudy Quan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nordquist vs Quan analysis and find out who is favored!
Arvid Nordquist vs Rudy Quan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nordquist 0 - 0 Quan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nordquist has won 50.43% of points on his second serve, while Quan has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nordquist, in recent form, has won 52.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Quan has won 58.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.73% and 41.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nordquist has saved 56.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quan has saved 58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nordquist has won 41.38% of matches played (W/L 12/ 17), with Quan winning 58.06% (W/L 18/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nordquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17). Quan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Nordquist has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.38% of matches (W/L 12/ 17), where as Quan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nordquist has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.9 while Quan has played against players with an average rank of 77.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nordquist has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quan has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nordquist has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quan has converted 58.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
892
Rank
889
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
50% (117-117)
Career Total W/L
59% (22-15)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
64% (9-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arvid Nordquist | Rudy Quan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 64% (9/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 65% (20/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (124/102) | 53% (161/144) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:10 | 1:19:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 141.73 | 111.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (327/442) | 69% (473/689) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (204/327) | 58% (275/473) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (58/115) | 44% (96/216) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (22/48) | 59% (48/82) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (184/438) | 49% (330/674) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (6/10) | 64% (9/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 20% (5/1) |
Arvid Nordquist Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Facundo Bermejo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Arvid Nordquist
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
80%
(
85 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Arvid Nordquist
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Matthew Segura
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 3-4 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Rudy Quan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Rudy Quan
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
113)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Andres Andrade
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Victor Lilov
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Rudy Quan
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Cooper Woestendick
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Rudy Quan
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Karue Sell
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nordquist Vs Quan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
